virage du raccordement

Two weeks ago, I posted my overall look at the 2024 MotoGP season and I promised a detailed look into the teammates battles. It’s time..

Conceptually, I went through each factory in order of the championship results. Within each factory, I went through each team, again using championship results for the order. For each team, I compared riders’ numbers, the H2H stats and I also took a look at the difference in finishes for each session. The charts give the difference in finishing positions between each pair of teammates (when they had both participated in the qualifying session or when they have both crossed the finish line of a sprint/race).

ducati

ducati lenovo team

–	Enea Bastianini	Pecco Bagnaia
average qualifying position	6.7	2.7
qualifying h2h	2	18
average sprint position	3.7	2.9
sprints h2h	8	11
average race position	4.8	1.8
races h2h	5	15
dnfs	3	8
championship points	386	498
championship finish	P4	P2

Enea did better in the first two qualifying sessions of the season (a P3 and a pole while Pecco started 2024 with a P5 and a P4) but Pecco bested him every round after that, eventually getting the BMW M award for best qualifier of the season.

The sprints are where they were the most similar, mostly due to Pecco’s 5 DNFs. Enea only had 2 wins to Pecco’s 7 but they’re only two unities apart in terms of podiums (8 for Enea, 10 for Pecco) and they have a close average finishing position overall.

On Sunday, Pecco was clearly dominant. Despite Enea doing much better in 2024 than he did in 2023, the numbers don’t lie with Pecco’s 11 wins and 16 podiums to Enea’s 2 wins and 9 podiums. Since he DNFed less (only once on Sunday against Pecco’s three occasions), Enea had more points finish (18 against 17), missing on points in Barcelona 1 (penalty) and Mandalika (lost his front on lap 21).

Session	Enea Bastianini	Pecco Bagnaia
qualifying	2.5	4.7
sprints	1.8	1.8
races	2.0	4.4

As mentioned above, Pecco overshadowed Enea in qualifying but things were always fairly close during sprints.

On Sunday, Enea didn’t stir far from Pecco except on two notable occasions : Barcelona 1 (post race penalty for the shortcut and non-completion of the LLPs he was given in race) and Buriram (crashed and rejoined the race). The two times Pecco crossed the finish line after Enea, he was 2 positions behind (P3 and P5 in COTA, P1 and P3 in Silverstone).

prima pramac racing

–	Franco Morbidelli	Jorge Martin
average qualifying position	8.8	3.1
qualifying h2h	2	18
average sprint position	7.9	2.4
sprints h2h	2	18
average race position	8.6	2.8
races h2h	1	18
dnfs	7	3
championship points	173	508
championship finish	P9	P1

Pramac is definitely one of the teams where the teammates comparison hits the hardest. Between a Jorge Martin who won the championship barely making any mistakes and a Franco Morbidelli who missed testing and struggled for a while with the GP24, there wasn’t much room for a battle between the two teammates.

Franco only beat Jorge in qualifying twice : when he secured a front row in Misano 1 (a P2 to Jorge’s P4) and in Motegi (a P6 to Jorge’s P11 after a late crash in Q2) and the only time he finished ahead of his teammate while they both crossed the finish line was during the sprint in Indonesia (Jorge crashed from the lead on lap 1, made his way back to P10 while Franco scored points with a P5).

Franco Morbidelli did score one podium in 2024, a P3 in the sprint of Misano 1. He shared that podium with his teammate in P1 and fellow Academy rider Pecco Bagnaia in P2.

Considering how consistent Jorge Martin has been all season, the H2H by session is more of a study of how Franco Morbidelli evolved race weekend after race weekend.

Session	Franco Morbidelli	Jorge Martin
qualifying	3.5	6.7
sprints	5.0	6.3
races	–	6.9

And as expected, we can see the gaps being smaller throughout the season as Franco got a better handle of the GP24.

gresini racing motogp

–	Alex Marquez	Marc Marquez
average qualifying position	9.5	6.6
qualifying h2h	5	15
average sprint position	9.7	3.4
sprints h2h	3	17
average race position	7.9	4.7
races h2h	4	15
dnfs	6	5
championship points	173	392
championship finish	P8	P3

I think we all knew it was never going to be easy for Alex to compete against his brother on the same machinery and it showed in the fact Marc outclassed every single GP23, not just Alex. That said, it’s not even the comparison that hits the hardest amongst all teams and that’s being said while Marc finished P3 in the championship.

All in all, I don’t think Alex had a bad season. He’s one of the 9 riders who managed to score a podium on Sunday, went to Q2 16 times (12 times directly, 4 times with a Q1 visit first), DNFed less races than last year (6 in 40 —15%— in 2024, 8 in 33 —24%— in 2023).

Alex beat his brother 5 times in qualifying : 3 times when the two of them were in Q2 (Assen, Silverstone, Misano 1), once where they both stayed in Q1 (Barcelona 1) and once where only Marc was in Q1 (Sachsenring).

The only time Alex beat Marc in a sprint where they both crossed the finish line was in the last round of the season, Barcelona 2. On Sunday, he did it 3 times : Assen, Buriram and Sepang (where Marc rejoined the race after crashing).

Session	Alex Marquez	Marc Marquez
qualifying	3.7	5.2
sprints	2.0	6.6
races	4.0	4.8

pertamina enduro vr46 racing team

–	Fabio Di Giannantonio	Marco Bezzecchi
average qualifying position	9.4	9.1
qualifying h2h	9	8
average sprint position	9.4	9.4
sprints h2h	8	8
average race position	6.9	8.4
races h2h	11	6
dnfs	6	8
championship points	165	153
championship finish	P10	P12

If Fabio Di Giannantonio and Marco Bezzecchi are both two Italian born in October and November of 1998 who had their rookie MotoGP season in 2022; their respective 2023 season couldn’t have gone more differently. 2024, though? Marco Bezzecchi might have achieved the only podium of VR46 in 2024 but overall, they’ve had pretty similar results over the season.

Bezz managed to qualify directly to Q2 more (13 against 9) but Diggia escaped Q1 more often (3 times against one).

On Saturday, they stayed fairly equal with the same average finishing position, 4 DNFs for one (Diggia) and 5 for the other (Bezz), a P4 as best result for one (Bezz) and a P5 for the other (Diggia). Fabio Di Giannantonio did score points more regularly (9 times in 17 sprints -53% of the time- against 6 times in 20 sprints -30%- for Marco Bezzecchi).

On Sunday, Diggia had the advantage. He’s 5th overall when looking at the average finishing position (Bezz is 9th), his best finish is a P4 and besides his 2 DNFs, his worst results are a P14 in Misano 1 and a P10 in Portimao. He also placed himself in the top 7 on 11 occasions (in 17 races). Beside his podium in Jerez, Bezz had a good stretch of races between Germany and Japan, finishing all races in the top 8 with a P5 – P4 – P5 stretch with both Misanos and Mandalika.

Note : the long absence of number for the first sprints is a result of Diggia DNFing the first 3 rounds and Bezz doing the same with the following 2. Then, Fabio Di Giannantonio finished the Barcelona 1 sprint 3 spots ahead of Marco Bezzecchi (P6 against P9).

Session	Fabio Di Giannantonio	Marco Bezzecchi
qualifying	4.3	6.3
sprints	3.4	4.6
races	4.6	5.7

These results highlight the way their seasons had two opposite trajectories. Putting his 3 early sprints DNFs aside, Fabio Di Giannantonio had a strong beginning of the season and then struggled more with his injured shoulder. On the other hand, despite his early Jerez podium, Bezz did better in the second half of the season, having better qualifying and races results.

all teams

Ducati riders – H2H

Alex Marquez, Fabio Di Giannantonio, Franco Morbidelli and Marco Bezzecchi were never the best Ducati rider during a qualifying session, a sprint or a race (hence their absence in the above chart).

Overall, Pecco Bagnaia was the best Ducati rider in most sessions, Jorge Martin being close to him in qualifying and sprints. Pecco was above the rest 55% of the time on Sunday with his 11 wins. Marc and Jorge had 3 wins of their own while Enea had 2 + he finished P2 behind Maverick Viñales in COTA.

One could argue that it would have made more sense to separate the GP24s and the GP23s but with Marc’s P3 in the championship, I didn’t think it was fair to not have him next to Pecco, Enea and Jorge.

That said, out of curiosity, I focused on the other GP23 bikes and Franco Morbidelli. The head to head results are pretty representative of how those 4 riders finished close to each other between P8 and P12 in the championship.

Alex Marquez, Fabio Di Giannantonio, Franco Morbidelli and Marco Bezzecchi – H2H

ktm

red bull ktm factory racing

–	Brad Binder	Jack Miller
average qualifying position	10.3	13.0
qualifying h2h	14	6
average sprint position	7.8	10.1
sprints h2h	11	8
average race position	7.1	12.2
races h2h	16	3
dnfs	7	6
championship points	217	87
championship finish	P5	P14

Both KTM riders definitely had a more difficult 2024 than 2023. Brad Binder scored 25% less points in 2024 (217) than in 2023 (290) meanwhile Jack Miller almost divided his number of points by two (153 in 2024 against 87 in 2023).

2024 was a season without a single podium for Jack Miller (his best result : a P5 on 4 different occasions, 2 sprints and 2 races) meanwhile Brad Binder had his two podiums of the season in Qatar, he came close to more with a P4 in 4 separate occasions (one sprint and 3 races).

Brad was better in qualifying, with a better average and reaching Q2 on 14 occasions (9 times directly and 5 times going through Q1 first). Jack stayed in Q1 11 times, beat Q1 3 times and reached Q2 through his PR results on 6 occasions.

Sprints wise, their 11-8 split is majorly helped by Brad’s 5 DNFs (while Jack only had one). When they both crossed the finish line, Jack was ahead by more than 2 positions only twice.

On Sunday, things were reverses, Jack with 5 DNFs to Brad’s 2. The only times Jack finished ahead it was by 4, 3 and 1 position on his teammate. On the other hand, Brad scored 4 positions higher than Jack on 10 different occasions.

Session	Brad Binder	Jack Miller
qualifying	6.4	5.8
sprints	5.1	4.0
races	6.7	2.7

red bull gasgas tech3

–	Augusto Fernandez	Pedro Acosta
average qualifying position	18.5	7.4
qualifying h2h	0	20
average sprint position	15.1	6.8
sprints h2h	5	15
average race position	14.8	7.4
races h2h	3	15
dnfs	10	8
championship points	27	215
championship finish	P20	P6

GasGas is the only team where one rider outqualified his teammate in every single weekend of the season.

Every single time Augusto beat Pedro in a race, it was because Pedro didn’t cross the finish line, except the Sachsenring race where Pedro finished P22 after rejoining post crash.

Pedro Acosta scored 8 times more points than his teammate while Augusto Fernandez scored almost 3 times less points in 2024 than he did in 2023, scoring points in 2 sprints and 7 races.

Pedro scored 4 podiums on Saturday and 5 podiums on Sunday. Augusto’s best result on Saturday is his P7 in Jerez while his best result on Sunday is his P10 in Sepang.

Session	Augusto Fernandez	Pedro Acosta
qualifying	–	11.1
sprints	6.0	9.4
races	–	7.8

Contrary to the situation in Pramac with Franco Morbidelli and despite some good showings in 2023, Augusto Fernandez was never able to find the solution in 2024 and they’re the teammates pairing where we observe the biggest gaps in terms of qualifying and races finishing positions.

all teams

KTM riders – H2H

Truthfully, if anyone still needs a reason to understand why Brad Binder and Pedro Acosta are making up the factory duo at KTM next season, they can look above.

If Brad Binder managed much fewer podiums (2) than Pedro Acosta (11), he finished more races in the points (12 sprints and 17 races for Brad against 13 sprints and 14 races for Pedro), which eventually lead him to gain P5 back in the championship in the very last race of the season.

This made me want to study them a little closer.

–	Brad Binder	Pedro Acosta
average qualifying position	10.3	7.4
qualifying h2h	9	11
average sprint position	7.8	6.8
sprints h2h	8	10
average race position	7.1	7.4
races h2h	10	9
dnfs	7	8
championship points	217	215
championship finish	P5	P6

Overall, Pedro Acosta was better in the qualifying exercice. They survived Q1 almost the same amount of times (4 times for Pedro, 5 times for Brad) but Pedro directly qualified to Q2 more often (13 occasions against 9) and did better when he was there (4 front rows including his first MotoGP pole, none of that for Brad).

They had almost the same amount of DNFs but Brad finished more races (5 DNFs on Saturday and only 2 on Sunday) meanwhile Pedro had 4 sprints DNFs and 4 races DNFs. On two occasions they DNFed the same day : Motegi sprint, Phillip Island sprint (Augusto Fernandez was the only KTM to cross the finish line that day).

Session	Brad Binder	Pedro Acosta
qualifying	2.9	7.6
sprints	5.0	4.6
races	6.8	3.6

The big gap in qualifying is mostly due to the three times Brad Binder fully had a fluke on Saturday morning : a P17 in the USA, a P22 in France and a P19 in Indonesia. The average gaps goes down to 4.8 if we takes these three qualifying results away. With only 3 Q1 stays, Pedro had a P13 (Sepang), P14 (Spielberg) and a P15 (Phillip Island) as his worst qualifying results.

aprilia

aprilia racing

–	Aleix Espargaro	Maverick Viñales
average qualifying position	9.2	7.1
qualifying h2h	6	13
average sprint position	7.7	8.8
sprints h2h	8	10
average race position	8.9	8.6
races h2h	7	11
dnfs	7	5
championship points	163	190
championship finish	P11	P7

In 2024, Aprilia, with Maverick Viñales in Austin, blessed us with the only non-Ducati win on a Sunday this season. Maverick also won 2 sprints (Portimao and COTA) while Aleix got one (Barcelona 1). They both secured 4 podiums overall on Saturdays meanwhile Maverick’s win in COTA remained the only Aprilia podium on a Sunday.

If we look at the numbers, Maverick had the advantage on Aleix more often but the differences aren’t that high even if 4 spots separate them in the standings (only 27 points separate them with Aleix missing on 3 races due to injury).

Fun fact : despite Maverick always directly qualifying to Q2 and Aleix staying in Q1 7 times (and missing one qualifying session due to injury so participating in 12 Q2 sessions in the end), Aleix managed to capture one more pole than Maverick (Barcelona 1 and Silverstone vs COTA).

For some reason the Aprilia teammates always gave me the impression that they couldn’t both perform the same weekend. They’re the team I was the most looking forward to in terms of checking the charts under.

Session	Aleix Espargaro	Maverick Viñales
qualifying	5.7	5.7
sprints	5.9	4.1
races	6.8	4.1

I only include races they both finished in those analyses but for your information :

• Aleix’s finishes when Maverick DNFed : P8 x2, P9 and P11,
• Maverick’s finishes when Aleix DNFed : P3, P6, P9 x2, P16, P19.

Which makes my final conclusion : in standings, they spent more time vastly apart than close to each other.

trackhouse racing

–	Miguel Oliveira	Raul Fernandez
average qualifying position	12.9	13.0
qualifying h2h	10	5
average sprint position	10.8	13.1
sprints h2h	9	5
average race position	11.1	12.3
races h2h	9	5
dnfs	5	6
championship points	75	66
championship finish	P15	P16

At first glance, it looks like the Trackhouse teammates have had similar results throughout the season. They even almost have the same number of points finishes (both 3 in the sprints, 11 in races for Raul and 12 for Miguel) but the numbers read a little differently when you remember that Raul Fernandez never missed a race while Miguel Oliveira only completed 75% of the season.

Something to keep in mind, though, is the fact that Raul started the season on the RS-GP23 and he switched to the RS-GP24 in Silverstone, the 10th round of the season.

Overall, Miguel finished above Raul about two thirds of the time, whether it was during qualifying, sprints or races. To see if he was finishing way above Raul or just a couple spots ahead of him, we can take a look at the charts and the table below.

Session	Miguel Oliveira	Raul Fernandez
qualifying	2.2	4.2
sprints	4.3	2.5
races	4.0	4.2

Except for the rare occasions (Barcelona 1, Assen, Austria), they always qualified pretty close to each other (less than 3 positions between them in the other 12 race weekends they both completed).

With sprints and results, considering the fact that Miguel was pretty consistent throughout the season, you can tell that Raul had a better first part of the season than second.

all teams

Aprilia riders – H2H

In Aprilia’s case, there isn’t much to say with both factory riders rarely being surpassed by one of the Trackhouse riders. Miguel Oliveira did have his moments, notably being the best Aprilia all weekend at the Sachsenring and having a good Jerez weekend (two P8 results although both factory riders DNFed the sprint and Maverick finished P9 on Sunday).

yamaha

monster energy yamaha motogp team

–	Alex Rins	Fabio Quartararo
average qualifying position	15.7	13.0
qualifying h2h	4	13
average sprint position	14.1	9.9
sprints h2h	1	16
average race position	14.6	11.1
races h2h	4	13
dnfs	6	3
championship points	31	113
championship finish	P18	P13

There is no denying that Fabio Quartararo has been carrying the Yamaha camp for a while now and 2024 didn’t escape to the rule.

Personally, I don’t think Alex Rins did that terribly, even if the points don’t really show for it, considering he was a new (complicated) bike and still struggled with his leg during the season, in addition to the injury he sustained in Assen. He reached Q2 on 5 occasions, never scored a sprint point but scored points on 8 occasions on Sunday, his best results a P8 in Sepang and a P9 in Aragon.

Session	Alex Rins	Fabio Quartararo
qualifying	6.3	5.6
sprints	–	5.4
races	2.3	6.4

Alex only outqualified Fabio 4 times : once they were both in Q1 and it was a P15 for him and a P16 for Fabio (COTA). The other 3 times, Alex qualified to Q2 when Fabio didn’t. Fabio was always the best Yamaha on Saturday and on Sunday, when Alex finished ahead, it was by 3 spots at most.

honda

lcr honda

–	Johann Zarco	Takaaki Nakagami
average qualifying position	15.1	20.3
qualifying h2h	19	1
average sprint position	13.6	16.4
sprints h2h	13	6
average race position	13.6	14.6
races h2h	13	6
dnfs	8	5
championship points	55	31
championship finish	P17	P19

Considering the fact that it was hard to make the Honda reach the highest part of the standings, it almost looks like Johann Zarco and Takaaki Nakagami had similar racing results when you look at their average finishing positions. In the end, Johann still scored almost twice as much points as Taka, scoring points on 15 occasions (one Saturday and 14 Sundays) against 12 for Taka (all on Sundays).

Johann was especially dominant in the qualifying exercice, going to Q2 on five occasions for a best qualifying result of P7 in Mandalika.

Session	Johann Zarco	Takaaki Nakagami
qualifying	5.6	2.0
sprints	3.8	1.0
races	3.2	3.0

repsol honda team

–	Joan Mir	Luca Marini
average qualifying position	18.8	19.6
qualifying h2h	11	8
average sprint position	15.5	16.4
sprints h2h	7	12
average race position	14.2	16.0
races h2h	7	11
dnfs	15	4
championship points	21	14
championship finish	P21	P22

When we look at the averages (qualifying, sprints and races) for the two of them, it seems like Joan Mir and Luca Marini had pretty similar results this season. Neither of them appeared in Q2 in 2024 and they both have a P13 as their best qualifying result. Joan scored a sprint point once and they almost have the same number of Sundays where they scored (7 for Joan, 6 for Luca).

One big difference between the two of them lie in the fact that Joan DNFed almost 4 times more races than Luca (15 against 4). I will have to go back and check for eventual mechanical retirements to be sure of the % but it looks like most of the crashes that the Repsol Honda teammates suffered occured during races (4 crashes in total for Luca Marini in 2024, 17 for Joan Mir).

Session	Joan Mir	Luca Marini
qualifying	2.7	2.0
sprints	4.0	3.1
races	3.7	3.0

You can tell that except for the rare occurences (Mugello and Phillip Island), Joan and Luca always qualified in positions close to each other. Races had some larger gaps, Joan doing better than Luca in the first part of the season and then things going the other way around in the second part.

You can also see that there were only 8 Sundays were both factory Hondas crossed the finish line. That’s the lowest number amongst all teams. Then it’s Trackhouse and GasGas with 9.

all teams

Honda riders – H2H

Without a doubt, Johann Zarco was the most prolific Honda in 2024. Except for the sprints where things are a little more evenly distributed (Johann DNFed 6 sprints, the most among Honda riders), he was above the others on Saturday morning for qualifying and Sunday afternoon for races.

conclusion

I have concatenated all the results presented above in 3 different tables. As mentioned earlier, this only account for qualifying sessions where both teammates participated and sprints/races where both teammates crossed the finish line.

Example of a line in the table and how to read it :

teammates	difference	number of sprints
Binder / Miller	5.1	11

This means that in 11 sprints, Brad Binder (first name of the first column) crossed the finish ahead of Jack Miller (second name of the first column) and, on average, in those sprints, Brad finished 5.1 positions above Jack.

When looking at the averages, it’s important to keep in mind the number of sessions (qualifying, sprints or races) that have been taken into account. An average that gathered 12 races is obviously more meaningful that one only built on one race or two.

qualifying

teammates	positions difference – qualifying	number of sessions – qualifying
Acosta / A. Fernandez	11.1	20
Martin / Morbidelli	6.7	18
Binder / Miller	6.4	14
Bezzecchi / Di Giannantonio	6.3	8
Rins / Quartararro	6.3	4
Miller / Binder	5.8	6
Esparago / Viñales	5.7	6
Viñales / Espargaro	5.7	13
Quartararo / Rins	5.6	13
Zarco / Nakagami	5.6	19
M. Marquez / A. Marquez	5.2	15
Bagnaia / Bastianini	4.7	18
Di Giannantonio / Bezzecchi	4.3	9
R. Fernandez / Oliveira	4.2	5
A. Marquez / M. Marquez	3.7	5
Morbidelli / Martin	3.5	2
Mir / Marini	2.7	11
Bastianini / Bagnaia	2.5	2
Oliveira / R. Fernandez	2.2	10
Nakagami / Zarco	2.0	1
Marini / Mir	2.0	8
A. Fernandez / Acosta	0.0	0

sprints

teammates	positions difference – sprints	number of sprints
Acosta / A. Fernandez	9.4	14
M. Marquez / A. Marquez	6.6	14
Martin / Morbidelli	6.3	16
A. Fernandez / Acosta	6.0	1
Esparago / Viñales	5.9	7
Quartararo / Rins	5.4	12
Binder / Miller	5.1	11
Morbidelli / Martin	5.0	1
Bezzecchi / Di Giannantonio	4.6	5
Oliveira / R. Fernandez	4.3	9
Viñales / Espargaro	4.1	7
Miller / Binder	4.0	4
Mir / Marini	4.0	5
Zarco / Nakagami	3.8	12
Di Giannantonio / Bezzecchi	3.4	4
Marini / Mir	3.1	7
R. Fernandez / Oliveira	2.5	4
A. Marquez / M. Marquez	2.0	1
Bagnaia / Bastianini	1.8	10
Bastianini / Bagnaia	1.8	4
Nakagami / Zarco	1.0	1
Rins / Quartararro	0.0	0

races

teammates	positions difference – races	number of races
Acosta / A. Fernandez	7.8	9
Martin / Morbidelli	6.9	14
Esparago / Viñales	6.8	4
Binder / Miller	6.7	11
Quartararo / Rins	6.4	9
Bezzecchi / Di Giannantonio	5.7	7
M. Marquez / A. Marquez	4.8	12
Di Giannantonio / Bezzecchi	4.6	5
Bagnaia / Bastianini	4.4	14
R. Fernandez / Oliveira	4.2	5
Viñales / Espargaro	4.1	8
A. Marquez / M. Marquez	4.0	3
Oliveira / R. Fernandez	4.0	4
Mir / Marini	3.7	6
Zarco / Nakagami	3.2	11
Nakagami / Zarco	3.0	5
Marini / Mir	3.0	2
Miller / Binder	2.7	3
Rins / Quartararro	2.3	3
Bastianini / Bagnaia	2.0	2
Morbidelli / Martin	0.0	0
A. Fernandez / Acosta	0.0	0

bonus

Something that didn’t truly belong anywhere else but that I wanted in here anyway: points difference between teammates.

Rider 1 is the rider with the most points of the two.

Team	Rider 1	Points (Rider 1)	Rider 2	Points (Rider 2)	Points difference	% of points rider 1 has on rider 2
Aprilia	Maverick Viñales	190	Aleix Espargaró	163	27	17%
Ducati	Pecco Bagnaia	498	Enea Bastianini	386	112	29%
GasGas	Pedro Acosta	215	Augusto Fernández	27	188	696%
Gresini	Marc Marquez	392	Álex Marquez	173	219	127%
Honda	Joan Mir	21	Luca Marini	14	7	50%
KTM	Brad Binder	217	Jack Miller	87	130	149%
LCR	Johann Zarco	55	Takaaki Nakagami	31	24	77%
Pramac	Jorge Martin	508	Franco Morbidelli	173	335	194%
Trackhouse	Miguel Oliveira	75	Raúl Fernández	66	9	14%
VR46	Fabio Di Giannantonio	165	Marco Bezzecchi	153	12	8%
Yamaha	Fabio Quartararo	113	Álex Rins	31	82	265%

We can see that 5 teams had one rider scoring more than double the points (over 100% additional points) than his teammate : GasGas, Yamaha, Pramac, KTM and Gresini. On the other side of the scale, 3 teams had their top rider scoring less than 20% more points than his teammate, keeping things close : VR46, Trackhouse and Aprilia.

Regarding the riders that dominated the most within their teams, the top 3 are from 3 different factories (KTM, Yamaha and Ducati) and two of them are from satellites teams (GasGas for KTM and Pramac for Ducati).